Thursday, June 21, 2012

Online Tracking Ramps Up


Online tracking on 50 of the most-visited websites has risen sharply since 2010, driven in part by the rise of online-advertising auctions, according to a new study by data-management company Krux Digital Inc.
The average visit to a Web page triggered 56 instances of data collection, up from just 10 instances when Krux conducted its initial study, in November 2010. The latest study was conducted last December.
The rapid rise in the number of companies collecting data about individuals' Web-surfing behavior is testament to the power of the $31 billion online-advertising business, which increasingly relies on data about users' Web surfing behavior to target advertisements.
Krux, which sells a service for website publishers to protect their customer data, conducted its survey by automatically crawling six to 10 pages on each of the 50 most-visited sites as measured by comScore Inc. The study didn't includes sites that require a user to log in, and Krux didn't identify the sites it surveyed.


Despite rising privacy concerns, the online industry's data-collection efforts have expanded in the past few years. One reason is the popularity of online auctions, where advertisers buy data about users' Web browsing. Krux estimated that such auctions, known as real-time bidding exchanges, contribute to 40% of online data collection.
In real-time bidding, as soon as a user visits a Web page, the visit is auctioned to the highest bidder, based on attributes such as the type of page visited or previous Web browsing by the user. The bidding is done automatically using computer algorithms.
Forrester Research estimates that real-time bidding will constitute 18% of the online display-ad market this year, up from 13% last year.
"It's gone from virtually zero in 2009 to about a fifth of the entire market right now," said Michael Greene, a Forrester senior analyst. "We've moved from a traditional advertising model of buying 1,000 impressions. Now you evaluate and buy a single impression."
To make the auctions work, advertising companies are racing to place tracking technology on as many websites as possible. That technology gives them user and Web-page data to sell in the auction.
Krux in its latest study found that more than 300 companies collected data about users, up from 167 companies in 2010. The latest figure easily topped the 131 companies that The Wall Street Journal identified in a 2010 survey of tracking on the 50 most-visited websites.
More than half the time, Krux found that data collectors were piggybacking on each other. For example, when a user visited a website that had code for one tracking technology, the data collection would call out to and trigger other tracking technologies that weren't embedded on the site. As a result of such piggybacking, websites often don't know how much data are being collected about their users.
"It may be the first medium where the buyers have more information about the price, the value and the amount of inventory than the seller," said Krux President Gordon McLeod.
j � y e p� Ю B of storage. Microsoft said they would be priced at a similar rate to other tablets using the same type of processor built by other firms.
It added that the Intel-based versions would be offered with either 64GB or 128GB of storage and would have price tags comparable to ultrabook laptops.
Different chipsets
One tech analyst told the BBC that other hardware makers were likely to feel aggrieved by the news.
"Microsoft can offer a competitive price for these specifications as it doesn't need to pay itself a licence for the Windows 8 software which other manufacturers will have to do, and that might make its PC and tablet-making partners unhappy," said Carolina Milanesi, research vice president at the technology consultants Gartner.
She added that the firm appeared to have focused on a specific part of the market which wanted a more powerful device than the iPad.
"They seem to be be targeting a professional audience," she said.
"So they are going head-to-head with Apple within the corporate sector. Price will be key - these devices won't be at the bottom end of the market. They will probably let other manufacturers fight over that space."
By contrast the tech research firm Forrester said it thought the focus for ARM-based Surface tablets would be consumers, rather than the enterprise sector.
But one of its analysts warned there was a risk customers would shy away if they found it confusing distinguishing between the two types of Windows 8 experience. This will be the first time Microsoft will offer a version of its PC system designed for chips based on ARM's architecture.
"Microsoft will be its own worst enemy in this market,"blogged Sarah Rotman Epps.
"Consumers aren't used to thinking about chipsets. Choice is a key tenet of Windows, but too much choice is overwhelming for consumers. Apple gets this, and limits iPad options to connectivity, storage, and black… or white."
ARM's ambitions
Despite the potential for confusion, British chip designer ARM said it was "excited" by the news.
The firm's designs have already proved popular with smartphone makers, but Microsoft's support for its technology in Windows 8 offers it the potential to expand into a market dominated until now by Intel and AMD.
"This represents a significant milestone in Microsoft's journey to expand the support of the Windows operating system and embrace the ARM architecture," said Lance Howarth, the firm's vice president of marketing.
"With the Surface for Windows RT announcement we are delighted to see yet another example of this partnership in action which follows on from various Windows RT devices demonstrated at Taiwan's Computex show recently."
Intel said it was also "pleased" about Microsoft's move.
"Intel believes in and supports an open and healthy ecosystem that delivers a broad scale of innovation and choice in solutions and user experiences," a statement said.
"We also believe Windows 8 on Intel architecture will deliver the most complete experience with the best performance and compatibility across all computing platforms."

No comments:

Post a Comment